RAV KCC ATL HOU DEN NWE LVR CRD MIN SDG CLE CIN LV BOS TB STL NO WSH ARI PHO PIT CAR JAC MIA CHI CLV CHR W 40x40 ARZ LA TBB RAI RAV KCC ATL HOU DEN NWE LVR CRD MIN SDG CLE CIN LV BOS TB STL NO WSH ARI PHO PIT CAR JAC MIA CHI CLV CHR W 40x40 ARZ LA TBB RAI

Draft Information by: Years, Teams, Positions

Art Plunkett () - 1981 NFL Draft Pick #216 by RAM

What The Experts Thought Before The Draft

Pre-Draft Analysis for Art Plunkett (1981 NFL Draft)

Player Profile:
  • Name: Art Plunkett
  • Position: Quarterback
  • College: University of California, Berkeley
Overview:
Art Plunkett was regarded as a talented quarterback prospect heading into the 1981 NFL Draft. His performances in college showcased a blend of athleticism, strong arm, and leadership qualities that caught the attention of NFL scouts. Strengths:
  • Strong Arm: Plunkett possessed the ability to make all the necessary throws, showing impressive velocity on deep passes.
  • Mobility: He demonstrated good mobility for a quarterback, allowing him to evade pressure and extend plays.
  • Leadership: Coaches praised his leadership skills, noting his ability to motivate teammates and command the huddle.
  • Experience: Having started multiple seasons at Cal, he brought valuable experience to the table.
Weaknesses:
  • Consistency: Plunkett struggled with consistency at times, resulting in some erratic performances during his college career.
  • Decision-Making: There were concerns about his decision-making under pressure, which could lead to turnovers.
  • Injury History: Past injuries raised red flags for some teams regarding his durability at the professional level.
Projected Draft Position:
Many analysts projected Plunkett to be selected in the mid to late rounds of the draft, with potential interest from teams looking for a developmental quarterback. His physical tools were undeniable, but concerns about his performance consistency and injury history made him a somewhat risky pick. Conclusion:
Art Plunkett entered the 1981 NFL Draft with a mixed bag of strengths and weaknesses. While teams appreciated his physical abilities and leadership traits, questions about his consistency and decision-making could impact his draft stock. Depending on team needs, he could be a valuable asset for a franchise willing to invest time in his development.