CURRENT · TRANSPARENT · POSITION-RELATIVE

MFT Punters Rankings

MFT Player Rankings compare current players using an original statistical model. Rankings are not copied from PFF or another publisher, and they are not film grades.

2026 preseason baseline · Published · Model mft-v1.0

POSITION BOARD

Punters

45 shown
RankPlayerPosTeamScoreData
#1Jeremy CrawshawPDEN80.4Full
#2Tommy TownsendPTEN79.6Full
#3Austin McNamaraPNYJ79.5Full
#4Ryan WrightPNO76.9Full
#5Bradley PinionPMIA72.6Full
#6Johnny HekkerPMIN72.4Full
#7Ryan RehkowPCIN72.4Full
#8Corliss WaitmanPSF70.7Full
#9Braden MannPPHI69.6Full
#10Corey BojorquezPCLE69.5Full
#11Tress WayPWAS69.2Full
#12A.J. ColePLV67.4Full
#13Jake BaileyPATL67.0Full
#14Matt AraizaPKC65.7Full
#15Sam MartinPCAR64.8Full
#16Jack FoxPDET64.4Full
#17Jordan StoutPNYG63.7Full
#18Riley DixonPTB63.4Full
#19Tory TaylorPCHI60.1Full
#20Logan CookePJAX59.3Full
#21J.K. ScottPLAC58.9Full
#22Bryce BaringerPNE54.6Full
#23Bryan AngerPDAL50.0Full
#24Ethan EvansPLA49.9Full
#25Michael DicksonPSEA49.7Full
#26Rigoberto SanchezPIND46.3Full
#27Jamie GillanPNYG45.9Full
#28Kai KroegerPHOU45.7Full
#29Thomas MorsteadPSF45.2Full
#30Daniel WhelanPGB44.9Full
#31Matt HaackPARI39.7Full
#32Mitch WishnowskyPBUF38.8Full
#33Blake GillikinPAZ35.5Full
#34Cameron JohnstonPPIT34.4Full
#35Aidan LarosPPIT0.0New/returning
#36Brett ThorsonPMIN0.0New/returning
#38Jack StonehousePHOU0.0New/returning
#39Jake JulienP0.0New/returning
#40Luke ElzingaPBAL0.0New/returning
#41Nik ConstantinouPCLE0.0New/returning
#42Ryan EckleyPBAL0.0New/returning
#43Seth VernonPMIA0.0New/returning
#44Tommy DomanPBUF0.0New/returning
#45Trenton GillPATL0.0New/returning
#46Wes PahlPCLE0.0New/returning

HOW IT WORKS

What the score measures

Each position uses its own mix of production, efficiency, impact plays, and availability. Metrics are converted to position percentiles and combined into a 0–100 MFT Score.

Preseason rankings use the previous regular season as a baseline. Players without prior-season data remain ranked, but are marked New/returning. Offensive line and long-snapper rankings are marked Limited because public box-score data cannot measure those jobs completely.

Read the methodology and source policy →

Use rankings responsibly

The model summarizes recorded performance; it does not account for every assignment, injury, scheme, or coaching decision. Treat close scores as a tier, not a claim of exact certainty.